When a war is fought between
two nations, there are always two
views of that war, and how those who
come after interpret the conflict can
be equally disparate. This is what
Lambert shows in The Challenge.
In June 1812, the United States
declares war on Britain. At the time,
the British have more pressing
concerns than this upstart and
fledgling nation’s attempt to make a
stand in a world where the Royal Navy
rules the seas. Their military forces
fight for survival in a world where
Napoleon wishes to reign supreme.
Little wonder that “the British simply
did not believe that the Americans
meant to fight about issues of
principle, issues which they had no
hope of upholding.” (1)
In his introduction, Lambert writes,
“This book examines the origins,
conduct and consequences of the war
from a British perspective, focusing
on the development of policy and
strategy in London and the conduct of
war at sea.” (3) The principal theater
examined is that of the Atlantic
Ocean, both coastal and at sea, and
the activities of the Royal Navy’s
North American Squadron. Although the
primary emphasis is on the naval
aspects of the war, the book also
delves into aspects that foresee the
future of United States activities –
westward expansion and the divisive
aspects between the Northern and
Southern states that ultimately lead
to civil war.
The book is divided into thirteen
chapters, each of which is organized
with subheadings. For example, Chapter
1: Flashpoints opens with the
confrontation between USS Chesapeake
and HMS Leopard in 1807.
From there, the chapter discusses “The
Continental System,” “Money, Land and
Honor,” “Economic War,” “Thomas
Jefferson,” “Between the Millstones of
War,” “Republican Visions,” “A Fleet
of Gunboats,” and “The Many Wars of
President James Madison.” Maps and
illustrations, including sixteen color
plates, highlight people and events,
while quotations from primary
documents of the period provide
glimpses of participant viewpoints.
Another interesting aspect of this
volume concerns where Lambert focuses
his attention. An underlying theme
throughout the narrative is USS President,
which is labeled “an American icon” in
one illustration. Many Americans have
probably never heard of this frigate,
but as he points out, tracing the
history and fate of this ship with USS
Constitution, which Americans
today will label “an American icon,”
summarizes the complex “judgements of
the war.” (402) On the other hand –
perhaps because of the focus of the
book and the British perspective – the
burning of Washington and the
bombardment of Fort McHenry are merely
summarized in ten pages. In American
history, these are key turning points
in the war and are given weightier
examination. While privateers are
discussed throughout the book, only a
few specific vessels and captains are
mentioned. Chasseur, one of
the successful privateers that eludes
capture and impacts British merchant
shipping, is mentioned because of her
design rather than the audacity of her
captain, who dares to blockade the
British coast. These examples showcase
why students of conflicts should
examine them from both sides, for in
doing so, they will gain a richer,
more comprehensive understanding of
the war.
With the start of the bicentennial of
the War of 1812, a number of histories
have been published, some of which
focus on the naval war. Few, however,
are written by British historians, and
this makes Lambert’s volume compelling
and eye-opening, yet also perplexing
and irritating to American readers,
who have a totally different concept
of this conflict. Of course, this
assumes that Americans have even a
cursory knowledge of the war, which
has long been given short shrift in
history classes.
The truth is that the War of 1812 was
an ill-conceived idea which the United
States was ill-prepared to carry
through. The country was sharply
divided on whether to go to war or
not; previous administrations had
decimated the navy; and the federal
government lacked the funds to wage
war. When peace finally came in 1815,
the issues that propelled America into
war remained unanswered, for the
treaty returned everything to the
status quo before the war began. So,
as Lambert asks in his introduction,
“how could a defeated nation, one that
suffered such devastating losses,
declare a victory and remain in
occupation of the literal battlefield
for two centuries?” (2)
This is the question that Lambert
answers as he delves into the history
of the war and how it comes to be. He
examines these events from the
perspective of a nation already waging
war – one that lasted for almost a
quarter of a century and often without
allies – against Napoleon. In doing
so, he puts Americans and their
history under a microscope that shows
the discordant elements that threaten
to tear apart the United States. He
also exposes how those who fight and
those who come after gloss over,
alter, or conveniently forget the
numerous losses, the devastating
effects of an economic blockade, and
the questionable measures that propel
America into war. These machinations
permit the nation to see the War of
1812 as a victory. Perhaps more
deftly, Lambert reveals how the
conflict serves to sever the apron
strings with England and allows the
United States to create its own,
distinct cultural identity.
Review Copyright ©2012 Cindy
Vallar